Are English-Only Policies Illegal Under Massachusetts Law?
Massachusetts law and federal law prohibit discrimination based on ethnicity. Do English-only policies amount to unlawful discrimination?
According to the EEOC, workplace English-only policies are unlawful unless the employer can show that the policy is justified by a business necessity, such as where English is needed to promote safety or efficiency in the workplace. Furthermore, a rule requiring that employees speak English at all times, even when on breaks, will rarely be justified.
Are you an employee living in Pittsfield, Springfield, Worcester, Lowell, Fall River, New Bedford or the Cape? Are you subject to an English-only policy? Contact Steffans Legal today for a free consultation.
In this case, a Massachusetts federal court denied a motion to dismiss a wrongful termination claim, relying on indirect evidence that made the termination look suspicious.
On February 1, 2022, Judge Mastroianni of the US District Court in Springfield denied an employer’s motion for summary judgment as to all but one of our client’s seven claims.
On March 4, 2021, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts provided helpful guidance for those struggling to understand the difference between direct evidence and indirect evidence in employment discrimination claims.
The First Circuit Court of Appeals recently reinstated a workplace racial discrimination case where an employer terminated an employee after a customer complained about the employee and in doing so referred to the employees height, race, and Jamaican accent.
A recent Massachusetts court ruling provides guidance on whether an employer’s denial of a request for a schedule change as a reasonable accommodation violated the ADA and Massachusetts anti-discrimination laws.
Can an employer can force an employee to get a vaccine or can an employer force an employee to wear a face mask? To answer these questions, one must resort to an analysis of state and federal laws prohibiting disability discrimination and religious discrimination.
An analysis of whether there are any First Amendment or anti-retaliation protections for employees regarding their social media posts on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.
Two recent cases expanded the scope of evidence Massachusetts employees may utilize to prove hostile work environment and workplace harassment claims.
The COVID-19 outbreak has changed many employment-related rules, including those that relate to what types of questions an employer may ask their employee or prospective employee regarding potential exposure to COVID-19.
Our Junior Associate, Flo, was caught possibly abusing medical leave. We walk you through Steffans Legal’s subsequent workplace investigation and decision making as to whether or not we could discipline or terminate her employment for the alleged abuse of medical leave.