Commission Payment Plans for Inside and Outside Salespeople Under the Massachusetts Wage Act
Determining if your commission payment plan complies with Massachusetts laws for payment of inside and outside salespeople in Pittsfield, Worcester, Springfield, Fall River, Lowell, New Bedford, and the Cape.
The Massachusetts Wage Act applies to commission payment plans. That part is clear. What is less clear is whether the payment at issue is a commission or something else, say a bonus. If it’s a bonus, the Massachsuetts Wage does not apply. If it’s a commission, it does. Employees want the Massachusetts Wage Act to apply because that allows them to recover triple damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and costs for violations.
what is the difference between a commission and a bonus under MASSACHUSETTS law?
Payments are commissions and not bonuses when they can be ‘definitely determined’ and are ‘due and payable.’ Commissions and bonuses are ‘definitely determinable’ when you can apply a formula to determine their value. Say for example, a plan that pays someone 5% of sales they generate over $100,000. If that person sells $200,000, you can calculate their payment as $5000 (5% of 100,000). Payments are “due and payable,” when the employee has completed all conditions on his or her right to receive the payment.
what happens under the massachusetts wage act if my employer does not pay me my commission?
Assuming the payment is a ‘commission’ (see above), you are entitled to triple damages, attorneys’ fees, and interest when your employer fails to pay you earned commissions.
Are you a Massachusetts employee wondering if your commission plan complies with Massachusetts law regarding the payment of commissions? Click below to speak with an employment attorney today.
A recent Massachusetts Superior Court opinion sheds light on whether an owner of a Massachusetts LLC can bring a claim under the Massachusetts Wage Act.
Steffans Legal filed a class and collective against against Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. and Campbell Soup Company, on behalf of employees seeking to recover unpaid wages for time employees spent donning and doffing uniforms, safety gear, and protective equipment.
Steffans Legal filed a class and collective against against Ken’s Foods, on behalf of employees seeking to recover unpaid wages for time employees spent donning and doffing uniforms, safety gear, and protective equipment.
Norfolk County Superior Court orders final approval of a settlement secured by Steffans Legal on behalf of Starbucks employees working in Massachusetts.
Yet another Massachusetts court recognizes viability of theory that employers must reimburse at the IRS rate for transportation expenses.
Steffans Legal wins judgment for workers in a time-rounding case brought under the Massachusetts Wage Act in Worcester County Superior Court,
On May 6, 2023, Steffans Legal filed a wage and hour class action against Wayfair alleging violations of Massachusetts law regarding the payment of final checks and non-payment of wages for all hours worked. The case is currently pending in the Suffolk County Business Litigation Session.
Last week a Massachusetts federal court judge granted Steffans Legal’s argument that department managers that worked at Hannaford can proceed with their claim for unpaid overtime on a class basis.
On January 3, 2023, Steffans Legal filed a wage and hour class action against Tufts Medical Center alleging violations of Massachusetts law regarding the payment of final checks. The case is currently pending in Middlesex County Superior Court.
Steffans Legal files class action in Middlesex County on behalf of UTS of Mass., Inc. employees seeking to recover unpaid wages for failure to pay overtime premiums for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek.