Steffans Legal filed a class action against Savilinx, LLC for failing to pay its Massachusetts-based call center employees for time spent booting-up computers, launching and signing into required computer programs, logging out of those programs, and powering down their computers.
Read MoreSteffans Legal represents an assistant manager who was constructively discharged after returning to work prematurely during Massachusetts PFML leave related to the birth of her child.
Read MoreSteffans Legal represents a Therapist who was terminated while she was on MA PFML leave and preparing to return to work with the employer claiming it no longer has any work for her.
Read MoreSteffans Legal represents a Senior Compliance Engineer who was terminated for absences during approved medical leave covered by Massachusetts PFML.
Read MoreSteffans Legal represents a Senior Accounting Supervisor who was terminated for taking intermittent MA PFML in Medford, Massachusetts.
Read MoreA Massachusetts federal court recently provided clarity on applying the joint employer test.
Read MoreA recent Massachusetts Superior Court opinion sheds light on whether an owner of a Massachusetts LLC can bring a claim under the Massachusetts Wage Act.
Read MoreOn June 13, 2024, the Massachusetts Appeals Court, in Tran v. Jennings Road Management, issued helpful guidance on determining whether an entity is considered an employer in the context of employment cases.
Read MoreSteffans Legal filed a class and collective against against Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. and Campbell Soup Company, on behalf of employees seeking to recover unpaid wages for time employees spent donning and doffing uniforms, safety gear, and protective equipment.
Read MoreSteffans Legal filed a class and collective against against Ken’s Foods, on behalf of employees seeking to recover unpaid wages for time employees spent donning and doffing uniforms, safety gear, and protective equipment.
Read MoreNorfolk County Superior Court orders final approval of a settlement secured by Steffans Legal on behalf of Starbucks employees working in Massachusetts.
Read MoreYet another Massachusetts court recognizes viability of theory that employers must reimburse at the IRS rate for transportation expenses.
Read MoreSteffans Legal pursues three new claims under the Massachusetts Paid Family and Medical Leave Act.
Read MoreSteffans Legal wins judgment for workers in a time-rounding case brought under the Massachusetts Wage Act in Worcester County Superior Court,
Read MoreOn May 6, 2023, Steffans Legal filed a wage and hour class action against Wayfair alleging violations of Massachusetts law regarding the payment of final checks and non-payment of wages for all hours worked. The case is currently pending in the Suffolk County Business Litigation Session.
Read MoreLast week a Massachusetts federal court judge granted Steffans Legal’s argument that department managers that worked at Hannaford can proceed with their claim for unpaid overtime on a class basis.
Read MoreIn this case, a Massachusetts federal court denied a motion to dismiss a wrongful termination claim, relying on indirect evidence that made the termination look suspicious.
Read MoreIn this case, a Massachusetts federal court denied a motion to compel arbitration because the defendant could not produce a written copy of the agreement and could not credibly establish that one existed.
Read MoreOn January 3, 2023, Steffans Legal filed a wage and hour class action against Tufts Medical Center alleging violations of Massachusetts law regarding the payment of final checks. The case is currently pending in Middlesex County Superior Court.
Read More
